Fische Fluppen Frikadellen
2002
Trade, sail and outwit the market to collect three coveted fetishes.
90
minutes
Medium
View game
Movement Points is a mechanic where pieces receive an explicit budget of points to spend on maneuvering across a board. Rather than moving a fixed number of spaces, pieces pay variable point costs depending on terrain, obstacles, or actions taken during the move.
587 results
At its core, this mechanic replaces simple space-by-space movement with a flexible spending system. A unit or character receives an allowance of points each round, which players spend incrementally to enter adjacent spaces, cross barriers, or change elevation. Because diverse terrain types demand different point expenditures, navigating a swamp or dense forest naturally slows a piece down compared to advancing along a paved road.
At the table, this introduces meaningful operational trade-offs and positional planning. Players cannot simply count hexes; they must calculate routes, weigh the safety of difficult defensive terrain against the speed of open ground, and manage point reserves to ensure their forces end up exactly where needed before their budget runs dry.
Players physically flick pieces to move them.
87 gamesPlayers cover or control grid spaces.
205 gamesPlayers move their pieces on a grid.
2,267 gamesThe game board is composed of hexagonal spaces, allowing for multi-directional movement.
2,207 gamesMultiple game elements interact in a stacked fashion.
209 gamesPlayers create specific patterns to score points.
954 gamesPlayers identify and respond to visual or logical patterns.
322 gamesPlayers collect and transport goods to different locations.
707 gamesPlayers move between fixed locations on a map or board.
1,071 gamesPieces are slid or pushed across the board.
68 gamesPlayers progress along a track.
566 gamesPlayers place tiles to form a board or map.
2,423 gamesPlayers progress along a predefined track, often gaining rewards or triggering events.
286 gamesThis mechanic primarily appeals to strategy enthusiasts and tactical planners who value nuanced board positioning over fast, abstract racing. Because tracking diverse terrain charts and optimizing multi-step routes demands deliberate calculation, games featuring this system tend to lean comfortably into medium and medium-heavy complexity weights, with relatively few appearing in casual or lightweight designs.
2002
Trade, sail and outwit the market to collect three coveted fetishes.
90
minutes
Medium
View game
2011
Evolve bizarre creatures and survive a radically changing prehistoric world.
120
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1991
Pursue treasure, evade warships, and retire rich during piracy’s golden age.
240
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
2022
Escape a monstrous asylum in a cooperative survival horror adventure.
120
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1992
Recreate five Roman Republic battles with leaders, maps, and counters.
240
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1977
Command armies and follow heroes as Middle-earth’s fate hangs in the balance.
210
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
2023
A tense two-player struggle for control of post-war Europe
720
minutes
Medium
View game
1986
Lead American Marines through perilous Pacific missions in solo World War II combat.
240
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
2019
A card-driven Vietnam conflict game of guerrillas, politics, and shifting control
360
minutes
Medium
View game
2022
Command corps, manage uncertainty, and fight all three days at Gettysburg.
4320
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1979
Forge fragile alliances across a fantasy realm of kings, magic, and betrayal.
360
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1981
A detailed medieval combat wargame with varied forces and scenarios.
240
minutes
Medium
View game
2022
Lead a faction, build power, and battle the Void for legendary glory.
180
minutes
Heavy
View game
2002
Build an underwater research station, launch submarines, and uncover Atlantis.
120
minutes
Medium
View game
2021
Battle through 12 dungeon levels using clever dice placement.
60
minutes
Medium Light
View game
1977
Fast pre-gunpowder arena combat with fighters, weapons, and armor
15
minutes
Medium
View game
2006
Command mobile warfare and master the logistics of the North African desert.
720
minutes
Medium
View game
2001
Shape the fate of Europe in a card-driven struggle for Germany
360
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1974
Command the Revolution across six levels of historical war-game simulation.
120
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1985
Build an empire, negotiate boldly, and risk a global war.
600
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
2019
Command both sides of an ancient war in a challenging solitaire classic.
240
minutes
Heavy
View game
2018
Guide colorful echidnas through a forest-floor traffic jam to deliver bugs.
20
minutes
Light
View game
2022
Command the Eastern Front’s pivotal battle through cards, chits, and bold decisions.
300
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
1990
A tense solitaire hunt for Japanese carriers across the Southwest Pacific
360
minutes
Medium Heavy
View game
2023
A complete collection of stretch goals and first-campaign expansions
90
minutes
View expansion
2016
Face a shadowy enemy in an intense solo tactical experience.
180
minutes
Medium Heavy
View expansion
2018
Expand Tank Chess with new tanks, obstacles, and customizable terrain schemes.
120
minutes
Medium
View expansion
2020
A central hub for digital board games, friends, chat, news, and more
120
minutes
Medium
View expansion
1995
Add 16 cards to We the People for additional play options.
120
minutes
Medium
View expansion
2024
A versatile Companion that rewards dungeon placement with an extra card.
90
minutes
Medium
View expansion
2021
Risk the Royal Navy for upgraded actions and valuable Crimson Silver.
60
minutes
Medium Heavy
View expansion
1979
Search, strike, and sink the enemy fleet in the South Pacific.
120
minutes
Medium
View expansion
1999
Recreate two pivotal Caesar-era battles in a focused two-player expansion.
360
minutes
Medium
View expansion
Movement points provide a piece with a numerical budget to spend each turn when traveling across the board. Instead of moving a flat number of spaces, pieces pay variable point costs depending on the terrain, elevation, or obstacles in their way. This turns positioning into an economic decision where every step must be budgeted against your available total.
Standard grid movement treats every space identically, whereas movement points vary the cost based on the environment. In basic grid games, a roll or stat of three moves you three spaces regardless of what sits between your start and destination. With movement points, crossing a river or entering dense woods may cost two or three points for a single space, accurately reflecting environmental friction.
Yes, many introductory games use straightforward movement allowances without complex reference charts. In Survive: Escape from Atlantis!, players receive a simple pool of three movement points per turn to navigate their survivors toward safety across land and sea. Similarly, Last Defense! offers a fast, accessible cooperative experience where players spend movement points to rescue scientists in games lasting around 20 minutes.
For younger players, Echidna Shuffle is designed for ages 6 and up and plays in just 10 to 20 minutes. Players roll a custom die to gain a movement point allowance, which they spend guiding communal echidnas along forest trails to pick up and deliver critters. It teaches the core principle of budgeting steps along branching paths without overwhelming math.
Movement points excel at two players because exact positioning directly drives tactical tension and combat maneuvering. In Unmatched: Cobble & Fog, two players spend set movement allowances to manage range and line of sight during rapid 20- to 40-minute skirmishes. For battlefield strategy, Memoir ’44 allows two opponents to maneuver units through towns, hills, and barbed wire in accessible 30- to 45-minute tactical matches.
Yes, cooperative and scenario-driven games with movement pools translate naturally to solo play. In Robinson Crusoe: Adventures on the Cursed Island, a solo survivor spends action allocations each round to explore harsh island terrain and gather critical supplies. Deep fantasy campaigns like Gloomhaven also work smoothly solo, challenging a single player to calculate exact movement values through dangerous dungeon rooms.
Experienced players looking for heavy systems often prefer titles that feature granular terrain costs and logistical planning. The wargame classic Advanced Squad Leader demands intricate calculations where units spend fractions of their movement allowance based on foliage, fortifications, and enemy sight lines. For epic sci-fi strategy, Twilight Imperium: Fourth Edition lets players upgrade fleet drive values to traverse hazardous gravity rifts and vast space systems over sessions lasting four or more hours.
Session length depends entirely on the game’s overall weight and scope. Lighter titles like Carcata finish in 20 to 40 minutes, while medium-weight deck-builders like Clank!: A Deck-Building Adventure typically run between 30 and 60 minutes. Heavy tactical simulations and grand strategy epics can easily extend from two to six hours due to the sheer volume of navigation choices.
The most common mistake is spending an entire point allowance solely on forward momentum without planning where the piece will halt. Ending a turn stranded in exposed, open terrain or stopping just one hex short of a defensive barrier makes pieces easy targets. Strong players calculate their paths backward from safe, defensible hexes to ensure they never run dry in high-risk zones.
Movement points allow game designers to mirror genuine physical geography without writing unique, convoluted movement rules for every map feature. Assigning higher point values to rough hills, mud, or river crossings organically creates natural bottlenecks and travel corridors. This rewards players for planning realistic lines of advance and deciding when to sacrifice speed for terrain protection.
Yes, calculating multiple route options across varied terrain costs can slow down play if players try to optimize every point. Comparing three or four potential paths to conserve a single point often leads to overthinking. Modern designs help mitigate this delay by using intuitive, color-coded terrain borders and printing costs directly onto the map boards.